Jordan, Kate and I met at Panera on Saturday to discuss the Fasolt text. We decided that history is what we create in our history books, conversations, and social experiences that we encounter throughout our lives. History can mean different things to different people depending all aspects of their lives. For example, I grew up in a pre-dominantly white, upper class area and the things that I was taught throughout my childhood is most likely different than what someone from an inner-city, more diverse area was taught. We felt that everyone has a different experience with history, which leads to a bias of what individual’s preconceptions are about history. However, one thing is certain. There is always a past, a present, and a future of time. History is the documentation, what has been written, and the past is something that happened. “If we know anything about the past at all, it is only because we have some knowledge ht there exists some past of which the sources speak to us before we even start to examine them (67).” The past is everything, and history is just a small glimpse of what the past is. Without the past, there would be no history, knowledge, or evidence that can be studied or written about. The present is here and now, what we are experiencing at this moment. It is “undocumented, unknown, and undead (70)”, a source of which we live in. The Future, an aspect of the present, has the ability to change in the freedom of time.
It ain't no mist'ry If it's politics or hist'ry The thing ya gotta know is Everything is showbiz.
(or at least, so sings a gay Adolf Hitler in The Producers)
Saturday, April 23, 2011
What is life?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with the how you explain that everyone views history in their own way since we are all born into different environments. This is very interesting because as you say, someone who is born in the suburb or an urban area is different from someone who learns history in a ghetto school in the city. Even history teachers teach history in a biased way; they never explain the other side's views. For example, some teacher might be teaching the American Vietnam war, they only give the American point of view. In addition, if you go to Vietnam for example, their part of the story would be a lot different than it is here in the US.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you (the blogger) and the first guy that comment you (Ahmed XD). In my meeting, my partners and I also talk about the same issue, history is very bias, like how history textbooks are thought to be the very neutral ones but actually more bias than anything else. "We saw this more as a life inspirational quote saying that the past changes depending on who you are and what you experience. You have to know your own identity, and strengths before you are able to realize what things from the past mean to you, and what the future holds for you." <== This is important, this is why we need to learn history so that we don't repeat mistakes in the future, so that we know what is better and follow that path.
ReplyDelete